The House of Representatives passed the new GOP version of
the Violence Against Women Act renewal last month, which was met with
democratic opposition. The democratic House members denounced the bill as
lacking in inclusive language for protection and provision of services for
victims of domestic violence, to include queer and trans* identified individuals.
The democratic demand is that all victims, regardless of gender or sexual
identity deserve assistance in cases of domestic violence, and that the
language in the House bill is not inclusive, and needs a broader definition to
include marginalized communities.
In
order to create a safe space for LGBT, women of color, and other minority and
marginalized groups, bills need to be carefully worded to be inclusive. As we
saw in the CDC report on the risks faced by minority sexual identity groups,
there is a higher risk, and many minority groups hold a fear of reporting, even
higher than that of the dominant groups (where it is already difficult to get
people to report. If there is an inclusion in policy, it would send a message
that the needs of marginalized groups also matter, and might encourage
reporting.
Societal
norms need to change as well. Our culture needs to stop portraying women in
damsel in distress, and other sexualized violence. As we saw in Tough Guise,
the ideal of only showing men in a dominant culture perpetuates their need to
raise the bar. We see in films rewards for engaging in violent activities
usually involve a sex scene or the degradation of a woman. Films in any genre,
from horror to action to “chick flicks”, violence in men is seen as masculine and
attractive, and is rewarded by female submission and attention. We need to stop
perpetuating and reflecting this stereotype, and stop teaching our children
from the time that they are young that these are their gender roles: to attack
and protect, and to be the object of desire and protected.
No comments:
Post a Comment